Interactive Lab · Data Analysis & EDA

Before you model anything, look at your data.

Its shape tells you what the summary numbers hide. A single "average" can quietly lie to you, pulled around by a long tail or one freak value, while the median barely flinches. Below is a synthetic sample you can bend at will. Drag the knobs, drop in an outlier, and watch the mean chase the tail while the median holds its ground.

🎬 Watch the 90-second explainer, then bend the shape and watch the numbers below ↓

▶ The playground, bend the shape, watch the numbers react

mean (chases the tail) median (holds its ground)
mean = 0.00median = 0.00std = 0.00skewness = 0.00n = 600
left tail ◀symmetric▶ right tail
0.3 · tightwide · 3.0
20 · noisysmooth · 4000

🧭 Where this fits

Knowing a distribution's shape, and when the mean lies, is the first skill of data work: latency is long-tailed (report p99, not average), income is skewed (report median), and A/B metrics need the right summary or the decision flips. The billionaire-in-the-room effect you just saw ships wrong dashboards every day.

The code that's actually running



  

🔮 Predict, then test

Skew the distribution hard to the right, then hit 💥 Add an outlier, a lone giant value, like one billionaire in a room of ordinary earners. Before you look: which moves more, the mean or the median? And if you had to report a single "typical" value for skewed income data, which of the two would you trust?

The takeaway

Your new mental model of a distribution